Book Reviews

Book Review: “Belichick” by Ian O’Conner

July 14, 2020 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

Belichick: The Making of the Greatest Football Coach of All Time by Ian O’Connor
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Ok, ok…I got curious. I am decidedly not a Pats fan. But success is intriguing, and I wanted to see what sort of leader the most successful coach in NFL history was.
In short, there aren’t a lot of takeaways in this book, as Belichick notoriously holds his cards close. This biography is largely what others have to say about him. He is ruthlessly focused. He is surprisingly generous. He is shameless in gaming the rules. He is great at taking responsibility for team failures. He is willing to listen to any idea which legitimately gives his team an edge.
In other words, he knows what his job is, and he has devoted himself to getting that job done and setting an example to his team to be that devoted. The most interesting tidbit is when O’Conner makes a clear case that Belichick was ready to move on from Brady quite a while ago…so the 2020 season will be a wish come true for ol’ Bill.
The writing style was a bit too scattered/disorganized for enjoyable reading. The “episodes” often felt out of order, or told in a clunky way. But fans of football will quite enjoy a more “inside” look at the most hated (or if you’re from Boston, beloved) coach of all time, largely because he is the most victorious football coach of all time. I guess the main thing to takeaway is that it ain’t easy being the best.

OTHER BOOK REVIEWS

Book Review: “In the Devil’s Snare” by Mary Beth Norton

June 24, 2020 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692 by Mary Beth Norton
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Well this was a fun, albeit tedious, one to read. Mary Beth Norton, a feminist historian, took a look at all the “interpretations” of the Salem Witch Trials, and finally concluded they all got it wrong. She set about putting all the legal and personal documents into a chronological timeline and you might say she found something many historians (who were wearing the feminist tinted glasses) had missed when looking at this famous period of early colonial history.

In short, most historians had never made the connection between how all of the “victims” of the witches, and many of the witches themselves, had either been or had relatives affected by the Wabanaki Indian wars on the Maine frontier. In other words, the Puritan mindset of coming to establish a City on a Hill, and thus coming into spiritual conflict with unseen powers, became a broiling fear of witches who were in league with the Indian tribes which the settlers were locked in gruesome battles with.

This was a very thorough history of the Salem Witch crisis, and Norton, to her credit, refuses to put on the “smash the patriarchy” mindset that many of her predecessors have. She argues that what made the Salem trials different is that very young women were given more legal clout than ever before during this crisis. This was not the Patriarchy trying to suppress and kill “unruly women.” This was the result of fear unfettered and imaginations left to run wild. On the whole, a really worthwhile book with some fascinating historical details.

View all my reviews

Book Review: “American Nations” by Colin Woodard

April 2, 2020 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America by Colin Woodard
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

One of the more prevalent myths about the US of A is that we are united. We all know that it isn’t true, and yet in every political speech we are reminded that we must “come together”, unite, work as one, etc. This presumes that the various states have a monolithic goal, and that our priorities can somehow find harmonic allignment.

Colin Woodard puts forward an excellent hypothesis that America is not a nation of red states or blue states, marked by conservatives versus liberals. Rather, we are a nation with eleven distinct nations, rooted in very distinct cultural values and aims. He shows how the various European migrations and settlements in the New World had wildly differing priorities and formed a smorgasbord of civilizations.

What is most interesting is his application of these “fault lines” to more modern elections/issues. The eleven nations he identifies can have their borders traced clearly after every election. His twitter feed is often full of maps of various issues or elections and, true to form, there are the several nations/blocs he identifies.

Even in avoiding death, #AmericanNations patterns recognizable: https://t.co/weJGkbu56X
— Colin Woodard (@WoodardColin) March 23, 2020

In short, the Puritans of New England shaped their modest, self-government, promised land culture, the Scots-Irish shaped a warlike ethos of individualism in Appalachia, the gentry of the Carolinas and Virginias aimed to recreate the traditions of the English countryside, the Spaniards left their legacy of communalism mixed with autocracy. After showing the formation of these and a few other cultures/nations, Woodard goes on to trace how they mingled (or not), and how they have set the landscape for current political and cultural battles.

Overall, this was a terrifically insightful book. At points Woodard whiffs, in my estimation, in fleshing out some aspects of the various nations. In particular, he falls victim to one of the classic caricatures of Puritans being folk who don’t like having any fun, and make it their business to make sure other don’t either. Also, as is common, he doesn’t present some of the better aspects of the Deep South before and during the Civil War (painting it largely in terms of their attachment to racism/slavery, with little “airtime” given to some of the other factors in play). The nature of his book necessitates plenty of generalizing, and on the whole, I think he generalizes with the best of ’em (for better or worse).

The main takeaway is that the US never has been a monolithic culture, and any attempt to do so will quickly discover the fault lines of our various “nations.” He notes that it is likely that by 2100 we will see a different border to the US than the present one, and he presciently mentions a global pandemic as an event which might result in a “redrawing” of the nation’s border through a break-up into smaller confederations.

Something that struck me (which Woodard doesn’t draw out as he is not writing this with a religious lens) is that while Yankeedom (i.e. Puritan Calvinists) set out to bring the Kingdom of God to earth (as we are called to do), this must never be divorced from the pure Gospel of Christ and Him crucified. Yankeedom went far astray when it thought it could shape a gloriously ordered culture merely by human will-power. It will never happen apart from evangelical faith in the Son of God.

This was a really terrific read. There are plenty of valuable insights to be gleaned, and where I differ with Woodard on certain things he would likely point out that it is because he is from Yankee-dom and I’m a mutt of Greater Appalachia and Midlands who was raised in the Far West who wants a return to the glory days of Puritan Yankeedom. If you don’t understand any of that…then read the book.

Book Review: “The Coming of Bill” by PG Wodehouse

March 26, 2020 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

The Coming Of Bill by P.G. Wodehouse
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Were I to go out on a limb, as I am often inclined to do, I would say that this book should be mandatory for engaged couples to read. I read it on a trip recently, and then––as soon as I finished it––I started it again, reading aloud with my wife. First of all, Wodehouse is positively hilarious (especially throughout the first half). Here is a sampling of both his laugh out loud moments and pithy sayings which are sprinkled throughout:

The minding of other people’s business a duty not to be shirked.
[Many suitors had] laid their hearts at her feet. One and all, they had been compelled to pick them up and take them elsewhere.
They have all got little, narrow faces without chins or big, fat faces without foreheads.
Fatted ease is good for no one.
To think humbly of herself was an experience that seldom happened to her.
His face increased the illusion of squareness, for he had thick, straight eyebrows, a straight mouth, and a chin of almost the minimum degree of roundness.
Talent without hard work is a poor weapon.
[The Baby had] a dough-like face almost entirely devoid of nose, a lack-lustre eye, and the general appearance of a poached egg.
P.G. Wodehouse, The Coming of Bill

The main arc is that of a young man (Kirk) and woman (Ruth) who fall in love, get married in a whirlwind, have a goodly child (Bill), and then are driven apart due to financial ruin and meddling relatives.

Kirk is the quintessential husband in need of a spine, and Ruth is the quintessential wife in need of submitting. The journey each of them go on to see their besetting sin is both humorous and illuminating. Wodehouse nails how dangerous feminism is in a marriage, especially when a wife listens to someone other than her husband, and how the responsibility for the marriage lies at the feet of the husband.

A good novel is like a mirror that shows you your own tendencies towards the follies being displayed by the characters. Wodehouse makes it clear that busybodies are just the worst, and common sense courage is just the best. Men need to work hard and love their wives, wives need to honor their husbands and care for the children.

This really was a terrific novel. Perfect reading during a national quarantine.

Book Review: “Debating the Text” by Douglas Wilson & James White

February 20, 2020 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

Debating the Text of the Word of God by Douglas Wilson
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I’d liken this book to a fencing match between two friends. They practice their swordplay, and are both skilled in the art, but each takes a different tact. However, their fencing is no mere hobby, but it is training for warfare. The Word of God is under continual assault from without the church and within. Unbelieving lions would like to undermine the integrity/reliability of the text of Scripture, while wolves from within endeavor to wrest the Scriptures.

Wilson and White each care deeply about the Bible. That is manifestly evident in this debate. Where they differ is which manuscripts––and more broadly, which manuscript tradition––should be understood as the original text of inspired Scripture.

Pastor Wilson holds to the Textus Receptus and the Byzantine Text type; while Dr. White believes there is still a “backlog” of textual criticism to be done to get the Church to the original text, and approves the Nestle-Aland/UBS Text as the sort of “jumping off” point for this endeavor. Neither denies that the Church does indeed have the authoritative, inerrant, and infallible Word of God. Rather they contend over the various discrepancies between the manuscripts, as well as what the Church’s process should be for how to make those determinations.

The audiobook is read by both gentlemen, which was a nice touch. There are points where the format of the debate seemed to leave them “talking past” the other. But I have it on good authority that these gents will be continuing the conversation in other venues in the near future. For those who need a good introduction to the Xs & Os of textual criticism and manuscript traditions, this is a helpful starting place; namely because these are two men who both desire the church to submit to the Word of her Lord, whatever He says.

MORE BOOK REVIEWS

Book Review: “Eastern Orthodoxy” by Donald Fairbairn

February 12, 2020 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

Eastern Orthodoxy Through Western Eyes by Donald Fairbairn My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Fairbairn offers a really helpful primer on the important things to know about our brothers and sisters in Christ across the Bosphorus. He also gives a good handful of insights on how EO believers view Protestants. Perhaps the most helpful takeaway was a very simple (perhaps oversimplification) observation about the respective traditions. In the West our salvation largely consists of “looking back” to the work of Christ upon the cross; whereas for the Orthodox, they view salvation as something we are “looking forward” to. The West is very text based, the East very image based.
Fairbairn is quite gracious towards EO, and I think does a good job of painting them in the best possible light. But he also doesn’t paint a Thomas Kinkade vision of EO; he highlights how often the understanding of Orthodoxy by the average practitioner is grossly in error (especially as regards icons), even while EO theologians try to be careful to avoid those errors. He also reminds Protestants of the areas where we are prone to fall into error.
That said, this is a helpful starting place to understanding the key distinctions, but Fairbairn doesn’t go as far in making it plain how truly grievous the errors are in EO. While we certainly should seek to understand where our Eastern brethren are coming from and what they are (and aren’t saying), we must not be naïve in thinking that our differences are insignificant. Altogether, I’d recommend this as a good beginning place; it was helpful to me in getting a grasp on the key similarities and differences between Geneva and Constantinople.

More Book Reviews

Book Review: “The Gluten Lie” by Alan Levinovitz

January 7, 2020 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

The Gluten Lie: And Other Myths About What You Eat by Alan Levinovitz
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

My record on food fussiness is well established. In short, I think we should eat just about everything with gratitude––even processed foods. Those who invoke the verse about our bodies being the temple of the Holy Ghost to justify their food anxieties and fears need the gentle correction of a holy raspberry.

Yes, now I remember, this is a book review. The Gluten Lie traces how food myths gain credence and become gospel, despite scientific evidence to the contrary. For instance, in the 80s we were told, “Fat is bad.” Then come to find out, it was the scientific studies funded by the margarine companies that were actually bad. Levinovitz has done a lot of deep diving on the complicated relationships between food, science, politics, dietitians, and how the general public is often having its chain yanked by the representatives of these various interest groups.

Perhaps his most helpful insight is how so many dietary gurus turn food and the enjoyment thereof into a sort of religious system. Priests declare foods clean or unclean, and if you eat “bad” food you must repent by purging out the unwholesome. For a faithful Protestant, we should have no qualms about saying, “The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof, so pass the gravy.” Instead, many Christians have gone along with the crunchy trends, thinking that they are pursing sanctification, wen in fact they are following an alternative religion.

A really helpful book on how to think about food, and about the many food myths that snake oil salesmen are peddling.

Other Book Reviews

Book Review: “Mere Fundamentalism” by Douglas Wilson

November 22, 2019 By Ben Zornes Leave a Comment

Mere Fundamentalism: The Apostles’ Creed and the Romance of Orthodoxy by Douglas Wilson
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I had the privilege of reading this book for CanonPress’ audiobook version, and then read it again with the elders of my church. Both times through I was thoroughly blessed, edified, and enlightened as to how to rightly hold fast to the apostolic faith. In Pastor Wilson’s own words, “Held the right way, narrow truths create the broadest of hearts.”

Wilson aims to show how fidelity to the Apostles’ teaching, provides the basis for true Christian fellowship across denominational lines. In essence, we need fundamentals of the faith to distinguish between Christian and non-Christian; but these fundamental doctrines are intended to unite Christians and provide them a basis by which to work through more tangential doctrinal issues. He does a wonderful job highlighting why creatio ex nihilo is such a vital doctrine to inform our understanding the death and resurrection story which God is telling. He covers mankind’s fall, and why and how God set about to redeem us.

The final chapter is a simple and short commentary on the Apostles’ Creed. Mere Fundamentalism is quite a useful book for even the simplest of theologians. It fortifies the faith, and points us to see that Scriptural foundations are vital for the furtherance of the Kingdom of god.